Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 3 Nov 2006 10:03:28 +0200
From:      Vasil Dimov <vd@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/mpatrol Makefile ports/devel/mpatrol/files patch-..::..::src::mptrace.c
Message-ID:  <20061103080328.GA73249@qlovarnika.bg.datamax>
In-Reply-To: <454AEF2B.1000007@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <200611030351.kA33peWQ061783@repoman.freebsd.org> <20061103061317.GB64699@qlovarnika.bg.datamax> <454ADF4A.5080201@FreeBSD.org> <20061103064819.GA64957@qlovarnika.bg.datamax> <454AE6B2.70702@FreeBSD.org> <20061103070602.GA65515@qlovarnika.bg.datamax> <454AEF2B.1000007@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 11:26:35PM -0800, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
[...]
> >>>>Vasil Dimov wrote:
> >>>>>On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 03:51:40AM +0000, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> >>>>>>sobomax     2006-11-03 03:51:40 UTC
> >>>>>[...]
> >>>>>>Added files:
> >>>>>>  devel/mpatrol/files  patch-..::..::src::mptrace.c=20
[...]
> The Porters Handbook unfortunately is out of sync with reality.

Which exacly part of the "Porters Handbook" do you mean?
If you really believe so, please send a patch siggesting to fix it.

> Long=20
> time ago, when the trees were big and the sky was blue, we did have the=
=20
> strict rule saying that any patch should be named patch-[a-z][a-z]. It=20
> was OK until the ports collection had reached the point when keeping=20
> individual history of each patch-XY became important enough, which you=20
> can't do with names like patch-XY. At that point "vote" was called to=20
> allow "free" names for patchfiles (but consistent within each port),=20
> provided that those names don't break any existing packaging tools. The=
=20
> result of the vote was positive.

I think the result of this vote/discussion is this commit:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-han=
dbook/book.sgml.diff?r1=3D1.549&r2=3D1.550
by krion.

It explicitly says that one should not use `:' when naming new patches.

> If somebody has sneaked its own definition into Porters Handbook I can't=
=20
> care less.

I would not call this sneaking.

> It is not official unless majority of active porters agree=20
> upon it.

You want a vote or what?

I really believe this discussion is going nowhere.

--=20
Vasil Dimov
gro.DSBeerF@dv
%
The guitar screamed like an angel who had just discovered
why it was on the wrong side.
    -- (Terry Pratchett, Soul Music)

--vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iD8DBQFFSvfQFw6SP/bBpCARAl7hAJ9MbUpqUKad7l3nVvpj9PpPMG4HkQCeNAul
78iWOpQevwkuacSzay9RC/k=
=iRDQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061103080328.GA73249>