Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 12:10:40 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: python@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 276359] security/py-flask-saml: Update to 0.5.1 Message-ID: <bug-276359-21822-7nUF3C9zG8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-276359-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-276359-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=276359 --- Comment #2 from John W. O'Brien <john@saltant.com> --- (In reply to commit-hook from comment #1) Thanks for taking this, Wen. It looks like the commit that landed is a little different than the patch I prepared when it comes to security/py-pysaml* in RUN_DEPENDS. I'm inclined to believe this was a mistake, since "pysaml24>=6.5.0<5" is self-evidently unsatisfiable. .if ${PYTHON_REL} < 30900 RUN_DEPENDS+= ${PYTHON_PKGNAMEPREFIX}pysaml26>=6.5.0:security/py-pysaml26@${PY_FLAVOR} .else RUN_DEPENDS+= ${PYTHON_PKGNAMEPREFIX}pysaml2>=6.5.0:security/py-pysaml2@${PY_FLAVOR} .endif Flask-SAML itself claims support for Python 3.8 or higher. PySAML, on the other hand, dropped support for 3.8 as of 7.4.0. security/py-pysaml26 still satisfies the ">=6.5.0" dependency and supports 3.8. What's your perspective? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-276359-21822-7nUF3C9zG8>