Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2000 18:12:52 +0900 From: itojun@iijlab.net To: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <jruigrok@via-net-works.nl> Cc: "Michael C . Wu" <keichii@peorth.iteration.net>, i18n@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: I18N Progress, Plans, and Proposals Message-ID: <28323.972205972@coconut.itojun.org> In-Reply-To: jruigrok's message of Sun, 22 Oct 2000 11:03:53 %2B0200. <20001022110353.B59522@lucifer.bart.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> which part looks gratuitous? could you be more specific? >#ifdef's for FreeBSD. we don't do this just for FreeBSD. while it is okay to claim that they should be stripped off on import, i believe you are missing the point. they are not gratuitous. >rune_t/_rune_t type recasting >_COMPAT_RUNE #ifdef's. >for example. as far as I understand, they are basically for backward compatibility with 4.4BSD runelocale code. they are not gratuitous. itojun To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?28323.972205972>