Date: Sat, 06 Nov 1999 23:45:28 -0700 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: rand@meridian-enviro.com (Douglas K. Rand) Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Intel EtherExpress Pro/10+ on -stable Message-ID: <199911070645.XAA03065@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "06 Nov 1999 18:29:22 CST." <87d7tni1p9.fsf@deneb.meridian-enviro.com> References: <87d7tni1p9.fsf@deneb.meridian-enviro.com> <199911030619.XAA18084@harmony.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <87d7tni1p9.fsf@deneb.meridian-enviro.com> Douglas K. Rand writes: : I ran into a problem with the ISA Intel EtherExpress Pro/10+ in that : the ex driver used the hardware address to determine if the card is a : Pro/10 or a Pro/10+. If you have a Pro/10+ and the ethernet address : doesn't start with 00:A0:C9 then you need to patch if_ex.c to : recognize the new hardware address prefix as a Pro/10+. : : Here is the diff I did to if_ex.c to get it to work for me: The card is probing correctly in -stable. It just never interrupts. I think this is a different problem. -current is seems to just work. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199911070645.XAA03065>