Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 22 Mar 2001 14:38:58 -0800
From:      Mike Smith <msmith@freebsd.org>
To:        Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu>
Cc:        freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: 4.3beta status report 
Message-ID:  <200103222238.f2MMcxs02824@mass.dis.org>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 22 Mar 2001 17:33:54 EST." <15034.32210.922514.879843@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>  > Question, why is all of a sudden a problem now, and it wasn't in 4.2?
> 
> It was a problem in 4.2 apparently.  Just not in 4.1 or prior.
> I had a hard time beleiving it existed since I never run with a getty
> on /dev/console..

We did a run around this in 4.0 or so; I can't believe that someone tried 
to put a getty on /dev/console *again*.

What was discussed before was fixing sysinstall to enable a getty on 
/dev/ttyd0 *if* the install was being done on a serial console; this is 
the only sane way to go about it.  Putting a getty on /dev/console screws 
up all sorts of things; most especially, non-serial-console installs and 
X.

-- 
... every activity meets with opposition, everyone who acts has his
rivals and unfortunately opponents also.  But not because people want
to be opponents, rather because the tasks and relationships force
people to take different points of view.  [Dr. Fritz Todt]
           V I C T O R Y   N O T   V E N G E A N C E



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200103222238.f2MMcxs02824>