Date: Sat, 07 May 2005 13:15:29 +0200 From: Alex de Kruijff <freebsd@akruijff.dds.nl> To: X3K6A2 <me@x3k6a2.net> Cc: Anthony Atkielski <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Mailinglist privacy: MY NAME ALL OVER GOOGLE! Message-ID: <20050507111529.GB1647@Alex.lan> In-Reply-To: <185825015.20050507114535@x3k6a2.net> References: <20050506103934.10FA34BEAD@ws1-1.us4.outblaze.com> <20050506105433.GA84877@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> <2410174336.20050506130648@wanadoo.fr> <185825015.20050507114535@x3k6a2.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 11:45:35AM +0200, X3K6A2 wrote:
> > Marc Fonvieille writes:
>
> >> All, and I said "All", mailing list subscribing forms mention their
> >> archives ("To see the collection of prior postings to the list, visit
> >> the freebsd-blahblah Archives."). It is impossible to miss it.
>
> > Then why do so many forms require that you tick a checkbox to assert
> > that you've read and accepted the terms on the page?
>
> > In any case, nothing like that exists for FreeBSD lists.
>
> To make sure, that even the most dangerous people, to the society accept
> the fact, that they need to think for them self.
How can one logicaly conclude that a message they send to the list is
included in google and other websites?
The damage of a lawsuite can be large to the BSD society. Just look at
what happend when the AT&T and BSD where involved in one. Is this one
reason realy that strong to risk this?
--
Alex
Please copy the original recipients, otherwise I may not read your reply.
WWW: http://www.kruijff.org/alex/FreeBSD/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050507111529.GB1647>