Date: Tue, 9 Mar 1999 14:50:20 -0600 From: Nathan Ahlstrom <nrahlstr@winternet.com> To: Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai <asmodai@wxs.nl>, Steve LaRocca <steve@adpcc.ds.adp.com> Cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Y2K Question Message-ID: <19990309145020.A22858@winternet.com> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.990309072542.asmodai@wxs.nl>; from Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai on Tue, Mar 09, 1999 at 07:25:42AM %2B0100 References: <005401be69ab$0f28aa80$79d37e8b@steve.adpcc.ds.adp.com> <XFMail.990309072542.asmodai@wxs.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Please direct your questions to freebsd-questions next time, thanks. Actually in his defense the y2k statement page, says: If you have further questions....contact freebsd-bugs. > There have been some efforts by, I thought, Danial Sobral(sp?) on the Y2k > readiness and it is my firm believe that since the 2.2 branch is officially > declared dead to upgrade to 3.1-STABLE which is believed to be very, very > compliant. It was Daniel O'Callaghan (danny@FreeBSD.org). But, unfortunately, he seems to be kinda busy lately and not responding to email or updating his web site. :-( Look at http://www.freebsd.org/~danny/ for the Y2K audit information. It is my belief that all known Y2K bugs have been fixed in both 2.2-STABLE and 3.1-STABLE, but I may be wrong. -- Nathan Ahlstrom nrahlstr@winternet.com http://www.FreeBSD.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990309145020.A22858>