Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2004 10:00:12 +1030 From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey <grog@FreeBSD.org> To: Lukas Ertl <le@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Jake Scott <jake@poptart.org> Subject: Re: Gvinum RAID5 performance Message-ID: <20041106233012.GK24507@wantadilla.lemis.com> In-Reply-To: <20041101112511.P629@korben.prv.univie.ac.at> References: <002401c4bf9c$c4fee8e0$0201000a@riker> <4185EEC2.7040106@poptart.org> <20041101112511.P629@korben.prv.univie.ac.at>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--YZQs1kEQY307C4ut Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Monday, 1 November 2004 at 11:26:19 +0100, Lukas Ertl wrote: > On Mon, 1 Nov 2004, Jake Scott wrote: >> Also - can anyone tell me if it's OK to have both gvinum and vinum loaded >> at once in order to perform operations that aren't supported by gvinum >> yet? And if so, is a "gvinum read" sufficient to tell gvinum of changed >> made by vinum?.. > > No, don't load vinum and geom_vinum at the same time. I know you know this, but for the benefit of the others: old Vinum is dead in -CURRENT. To confuse everybody further, gvinum will be renamed vinum. It was never intended that two versions should coexist for any length of time. Greg -- See complete headers for address and phone numbers. --YZQs1kEQY307C4ut Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBjV6EIubykFB6QiMRAo1SAJ41OppX58ZXbUMxcHz+38lZaDXgnwCfR9sm B8RFF/E7wkZND5QQWqmX3Nw= =FGev -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --YZQs1kEQY307C4ut--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041106233012.GK24507>