Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 00:44:37 +0200 From: "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@FreeBSD.org> To: Chris <racerx@makeworld.com> Cc: FreeBSD - Chat <freebsd-chat@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: 5.3R Schedule Message-ID: <20040809224436.GC750@zaphod.nitro.dk> In-Reply-To: <4117FB52.4050504@makeworld.com> References: <41179955.5020508@makeworld.com> <xzp8ycoqa0m.fsf@dwp.des.no> <4117FB52.4050504@makeworld.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--XF85m9dhOBO43t/C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2004.08.09 17:31:46 -0500, Chris wrote: > Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote: > >Chris <racerx@makeworld.com> writes: > > > >>http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.3R/schedule.html > >> > >>However, 4.11???? Now that's some wild numbering. Perhaps it should > >>have been: > >> > >>4.9, 4.9.1, and now maybe 4.9.1.1 or 4.9.11 or 4.9.1.2 - who knows. > > > > > >Excuse me? The latest release from the RELENG_4 branch was 4.10, and > >the next will be 4.11. > > > >DES >=20 > I was pointing out that yes - there is going to be a 4.11. Perhaps I=20 > should have articulated it. The version numbering scheme is odd. >=20 > For example, there is a 5.2 and a 5.2.1 I think the reason you think it is odd is that you don't see the different between a x.y and a x.y.z release. See http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/releng/release-proc.html for an overview of the 4.X/5.X release history. This is also discussed extensivly in the mailing list archives. --=20 Simon L. Nielsen FreeBSD Documentation Team --XF85m9dhOBO43t/C Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBF/5Uh9pcDSc1mlERAjm9AJ9Z/MueFYn/AEb2OKA7sy6Mn+knKwCeIhbc v2BkdLhe3BHu7E9kTY/1fK0= =Vpav -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --XF85m9dhOBO43t/C--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040809224436.GC750>