Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 16:59:44 +0430 From: mokhi <mokhi64@gmail.com> To: Achim Patzner <ap@bnc.net> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD MachO File format, your comments on it. Message-ID: <CAByVWPWBWqEzhJfOtsaRJGGFRWBnJbAUsme-%2B=6h6aWYXZ%2B4Jw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <40D5D502-FCA9-4405-A18B-FAB2E4478F02@bnc.net> References: <CAByVWPVv4bWb4D3ccSteraP51=J8%2BJkc=Rze9O%2B64ov5%2B9tG8Q@mail.gmail.com> <40D5D502-FCA9-4405-A18B-FAB2E4478F02@bnc.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 3/24/16, Achim Patzner <ap@bnc.net> wrote: > Would that project end in having an intelligent loader that will only map > the relevant architecture to memory (i. e. I=E2=80=99ll have extremely fa= t > executables supporting any known architecture in the universe on /usr/loc= al > or even for all files that can be shared between machines) and keep the l= oad > on memory and network as low as possible? It'll be one of its results, (at least) I expect :D though I'm not sure how it will have effect on network. > automatic cross-compilation to building I feel like Christmas came early. Then happy vacation ;) Thanks and thousands of regards, Mokhi.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAByVWPWBWqEzhJfOtsaRJGGFRWBnJbAUsme-%2B=6h6aWYXZ%2B4Jw>