Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 23:06:46 +1100 (EST) From: "Daniel O'Callaghan" <danny@hilink.com.au> To: Alex N Zhuravlev <alx@scn.ru> Cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Y2K problem Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.990112225635.3861A-100000@enya.clari.net.au> In-Reply-To: <199901120931.QAA22074@keep.scn.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 12 Jan 1999, Alex N Zhuravlev wrote: > Tell me please, if we can get some kind of an oficiall letter, that will confirm the > decision of the Y2K problem, concerning FreeBSD. All the information about us is > available upon request. See <http://www.freebsd.org/y2kbug.html>; and <http://www.freebsd.org/~danny/>; Well, I've had exactly 1 volunteer to assist in my review, and that one person is self-confessed non-C person. C'mon, perhaps a few more people could chip in and review just one occurrence of gettimeofday() as listed in my web pages. It took me about 4 hours to review 80 files, an average of 3 minutes each. There are about 150 more to do, so if 150 people spent 3 minutes in choosing a file to review and e-mailing me with what they found, it would all be done with almost no effort for anyone but me, the collator. Most of the responses will be "random number seeding" or "timeout set in seconds" or "lapsed time measured in minutes", and it does not take much effort to figure out which one. Thanks, Danny To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.990112225635.3861A-100000>