Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2011 00:29:58 -0800 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: Alan Cox <alc@rice.edu> Cc: Sean Bruno <seanbru@yahoo-inc.com>, "xen@freebsd.org" <xen@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: PV i386 patch Message-ID: <CAJ-Vmo=4Je%2BPf8fZgk_f5Nfe_mUw=Hnt=B=tHBepm0w-98qVjg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4EF245D1.2050503@rice.edu> References: <4EEB9CCE.6090701@rice.edu> <1324169806.3093.3.camel@hitfishpass-lx.corp.yahoo.com> <4EED4982.3080208@freebsd.org> <1324339762.3093.14.camel@hitfishpass-lx.corp.yahoo.com> <4EF04F3C.9010309@rice.edu> <1324387685.3093.28.camel@hitfishpass-lx.corp.yahoo.com> <4EF0D8D7.2060503@rice.edu> <4EF0EC1A.4010604@freebsd.org> <1324412718.12783.10.camel@hitfishpass-lx.corp.yahoo.com> <4EF245D1.2050503@rice.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 21 December 2011 12:47, Alan Cox <alc@rice.edu> wrote: > Can you please try the attached patch? =A0I'm trying to reduce the number= of > differences between the native and Xen pmap implementations. Hi, When I last tinkered with Xen, I noticed that it was _very_ easy to end up with FS corruption by just doing a whole lot of parallel software builds (in my case squid). This happened with single-CPU VMs too. I wonder if this would be fixed by your work.. Adrian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-Vmo=4Je%2BPf8fZgk_f5Nfe_mUw=Hnt=B=tHBepm0w-98qVjg>