Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 11:40:53 +0200 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> To: Maho NAKATA <chat95@mac.com> Cc: openoffice@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Need for openoffice -RC ports Message-ID: <48772AA5.6000103@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20080711.124154.13722130.chat95@mac.com> References: <48736130.3090400@FreeBSD.org> <20080711.124154.13722130.chat95@mac.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Maho NAKATA wrote: > Hi, > > From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> > Subject: Need for openoffice -RC ports > Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2008 14:44:32 +0200 > >> Why do we still have the openoffice -RC ports? Even one openoffice >> package puts an extreme load on the package cluster (let alone 6!), so >> I'd suggest they be disabled or removed if they are not currently >> useful. > > openoffice.org-2-RC port has been marked as IGNORE. > 2.4.2 is possible but I'm not sure so I just left as IGNORE. > > openoffice.org-3-RC port will be marked as IGNORE soon. > I'll update to 3.0.0beta2, openoffice.org-3 port, and > then I'll mark as IGNORE the 3-RC. > > openoffice.org-2-devel port has been marked as IGNORE, because > development has been moved to 3-devel. > and openoffice.org-3-devel port is active. > > So now, we have six ports, three are marked as IGNORE. > >> Also perhaps one or both of the devel ports can be disabled >> until there is a significant need for it. > > Yes, I ususally mark them as IGNORE if release branch is active. Thanks, that's a big help! Kris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?48772AA5.6000103>