Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2000 09:38:32 -0500 (CDT) From: David Scheidt <dscheidt@enteract.com> To: Rahul Siddharthan <rsidd@physics.iisc.ernet.in> Cc: Alexander Langer <alex@big.endian.de>, Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.rhein-neckar.de>, freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ViM vs. Emacs Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.96.1000420093706.7633D-100000@shell-1.enteract.com> In-Reply-To: <20000420175141.B5893@physics.iisc.ernet.in>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 20 Apr 2000, Rahul Siddharthan wrote: > Some things like multiple-level undo/redo work differently. > I like vim's way of doing that better. Depends what you're > used to, I suppose. But on vim, you can recover your unmodified > document by pressing u again and again: on nvi I think the ability > to recover past changes is more limited. :e! u should toggle changes. If you want multiple level undo, do it right, not by overloading basic functionality. David To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.NEB.3.96.1000420093706.7633D-100000>