Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 15:05:00 +0400 (MSD) From: Maxim Konovalov <maxim@macomnet.ru> To: =?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: suid bit sshd Message-ID: <20040820150433.A29713@mp2.macomnet.net> In-Reply-To: <xzpy8ka3yco.fsf@dwp.des.no> References: <200408131332.09164.ilkerozupak@yahoo.com> <20040813104934.GL87690@submonkey.net> <20040813153607.GF4198@dan.emsphone.com> <20040820114001.R28976@mp2.macomnet.net> <xzpy8ka3yco.fsf@dwp.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 20 Aug 2004, 12:20+0200, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: > Maxim Konovalov <maxim@macomnet.ru> writes: > > DES, is it OK to commit a following patch? Or you were going to > > deprecate ENABLE_SUID_SSH? We still have it in make.conf(5), > > share/examples/etc/make.conf and ssh-keysign/Makefile. > > The whole point with ssh-keysign is to separate out the parts of ssh > that need a setuid bit. It should not be necessary for ssh to have a > setuid bit if ssh-keysign does, which is what ENABLE_SUID_SSH controls > these days. Ah, OK, thanks for the clarification. -- Maxim Konovalov
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040820150433.A29713>