Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 12:08:42 -0800 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: Ronald Klop <ronald-freebsd8@klop.yi.org> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Increasing the DMESG buffer.... Message-ID: <CAJ-VmomREO6uj_izmD%2Bp90cFn=AQcz7UbZNkX8PVnU5mG_8ufQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <op.wn4141f88527sy@212-182-167-131.ip.telfort.nl> References: <50ACA59D.3080809@digiware.nl> <20121121101411.GG4535@server.rulingia.com> <50ACD522.7000706@digiware.nl> <50ACEE5B.8000901@FreeBSD.org> <50ACF891.4050105@digiware.nl> <1353513692.69940.7.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> <50ACFC6C.8070506@FreeBSD.org> <20121122040251.G21191@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <50AD0E82.3070706@digiware.nl> <20121121194142.8c4bf7d1977f13801a021ccc@getmail.no> <op.wn4141f88527sy@212-182-167-131.ip.telfort.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
.. because some of us like kernel behaviour to be predictable and controllable, rather than 'just be dynamic here, what could possibly go wrong.' Just bump the default kernel buffer size up to 64k and leave it hard-coded like that. Us embedded people can drop that down to something smaller. There. Problem solved, right? adrian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-VmomREO6uj_izmD%2Bp90cFn=AQcz7UbZNkX8PVnU5mG_8ufQ>