Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 18:37:15 +0000 From: Josef Karthauser <joe@tao.org.uk> To: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern vfs_subr.c vfs_vnops.c src/sys/sys vnode.h Message-ID: <20011219183715.A9679@tao.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <200112190802.fBJ82n387037@apollo.backplane.com>; from dillon@apollo.backplane.com on Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 12:02:49AM -0800 References: <200112182048.fBIKmsw61056@freefall.freebsd.org> <20011218233427.C412@tao.org.uk> <200112190103.fBJ134885760@apollo.backplane.com> <20011219010928.A3769@tao.org.uk> <200112190118.fBJ1IZQ85907@apollo.backplane.com> <20011219012344.A4024@tao.org.uk> <200112190802.fBJ82n387037@apollo.backplane.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--UugvWAfsgieZRqgk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 12:02:49AM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote: > hmm.. ok, there are some subsystems using sbuf's: >=20 > linprocfs > procfs > pseudofs >=20 > I think someone may have broken something in pseudofs, procfs, > and/or linprocfs that is causing the VFS cache and sbuf MALLOC > area to run away. >=20 > Anybody have any ideas? This certainly appear to be the case. I've unmounted procfs and linprocfs and I've got an uptime of 5 hours now. Result! :) Joe --UugvWAfsgieZRqgk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAjwg3loACgkQXVIcjOaxUBaEsQCdFnJWI2Sqx5m2GeovpyqhuwOs 4ZAAoJ3TP7ie72BZuXyLda4SXdw5gcOd =i+bx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --UugvWAfsgieZRqgk-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011219183715.A9679>