Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 12:11:45 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> Cc: freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: geom access method and g_topology_lock Message-ID: <50890251.8090402@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <94629.1351155886@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <5088E0E0.2080307@FreeBSD.org> <28185.1351150111@critter.freebsd.dk> <5088FA15.30205@FreeBSD.org> <70960.1351154478@critter.freebsd.dk> <5088FE30.2030903@FreeBSD.org> <94629.1351155886@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 25/10/2012 12:04 Poul-Henning Kamp said the following: > -------- > In message <5088FE30.2030903@FreeBSD.org>, Andriy Gapon writes: >> on 25/10/2012 11:41 Poul-Henning Kamp said the following: > >> To clarify, if that's needed, by "geom's access method" I meant the 'access' >> member with g_access_t type in struct g_geom. > > Ahh, sorry, I misinterpreted your question because I though the answer, as posed, > would be blindingly obvious. > > yes, that would not only be bad, that would be VERY BAD. I suspected as much. Thank you for the clear answer! Now need to think hard how to avoid doing that nasty thing... -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50890251.8090402>