Date: Tue, 24 Sep 1996 23:02:42 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Brian N. Handy" <handy@sag.space.lockheed.com>
To: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>
Cc: Chuck Robey <chuckr@glue.umd.edu>, Richard Wackerbarth <rkw@dataplex.net>, Warner Losh <imp@village.org>, current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: install on {Net,Open}BSD vs install on FreeBSD
Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.3.94.960924230203.5271C-100000@sag.space.lockheed.com>
In-Reply-To: <199609250410.WAA10368@rocky.mt.sri.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Tue, 24 Sep 1996, Nate Williams wrote: >> of the case is based on compatibility. I've disagreed with Richard in the >> past when he was using the compatibility to move us towards SYSV without a >> strong reason, but since we ARE bsd, and the -d option IS bsd, the > >The -d option *ISN'T* BSD. It was added by J.T. in NetBSD, and when >OpenBSD took the entire NetBSD source tree over it was there as well. >I'll bet BSDi doesn't have it, and neither does Ultrix, which are also >BSD based systems. FYI, -d doesn't exist in Ultrix. Brianhelp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.OSF.3.94.960924230203.5271C-100000>