Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 14 Jan 2006 14:31:38 -0800
From:      Pascal Hofstee <caelian@gmail.com>
To:        Jason Evans <jasone@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr>, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc/stdlib malloc.c
Message-ID:  <43C97BCA.6030201@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <6FD0F2BA-88E3-4E82-A5F8-D89051AEEECA@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <200601121809.k0CI9QGV028693@repoman.freebsd.org>	<AD9B1A12-47F1-4EA1-B270-CC83D3149543@freebsd.org>	<20060112182804.GA1047@flame.pc> <20060113012900.GA16082@flame.pc>	<554CC8A8-35FB-424A-B883-505C26ECBBE8@FreeBSD.org>	<20060114213238.GA15253@flame.pc> <6FD0F2BA-88E3-4E82-A5F8-D89051AEEECA@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jason Evans wrote:
> On Jan 14, 2006, at 1:32 PM, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
>> On 2006-01-13 11:07, Jason Evans <jasone@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
>>> On Jan 12, 2006, at 5:29 PM, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
>>>> Does it look like I'm right in thinking that this is a bug in Emacs?
>>>
>>> This looks like a bug in emacs, as you say, but I don't know if it
>>> has any particular relation to the posix_memalign() changes.
>>
>> Apparently it does seem related to posix_memalign() changes.
>> When I bootstrap Emacs without posix_memalign(), by manually
>> tweaking src/config.h after configure runs, and #undef
>> POSIX_MEMALIGN, then it passes the bootstrap stage normally.
>
> Hmm, that's interesting.  I'll mess around with emacs later on today 
> (though I only have i386 hardware at the moment).  Right now, I'm 
> still building xorg on my machine in order to try to reproduce the gtk 
> problems that Pascal Hofstee reported.

Hi Jason .. In the mean while i decided to do a pkg_delete -a followed 
by a fresh gnome install from standard ports instead of Joe Marcus 
Clarke's MC-gnome tree .. and it looks like the main culprit is 
glib-2.9.2 as the observed GTK-problems do not occur with the glib20 
port that is currently in the main ports-tree. So i think it's safe to 
assume glib-2.9.2 is seriously busted and jemalloc just happened to 
Really get pissed about it :)

I did encounter a malloc bug that's triggered by Evolution resulting in 
a runaway process that basically eats up all memory+swap before the 
kernel shoots it down .. but i am trying to get gnome@ to help me out on 
that one.

But overall i think it's safe to assume that the gtk-issue i reported 
earlier is linked to a malloc bug in glib-2.9.2 which is included in the 
MC-gnome tree.

-- 
  Pascal Hofstee




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?43C97BCA.6030201>