Date: Thu, 01 Aug 1996 21:20:46 -0400 From: "Gary Palmer" <gpalmer@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Peter Wemm <peter@freefall.freebsd.org> Cc: CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-sys@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/conf newvers.sh Message-ID: <6375.838948846@orion.webspan.net> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 01 Aug 1996 18:11:11 PDT." <199608020111.SAA09378@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Peter Wemm wrote in message ID <199608020111.SAA09378@freefall.freebsd.org>: > peter 96/08/01 18:11:11 > > Branch: sys/conf RELENG_2_1_0 > Modified: sys/conf newvers.sh > Log: > Now that 2.1.5-RELEASE is done, and the -stable code has had two commits, > it's time to stop calling it -RELEASE anymore. Revert last change and > set the "name" back to 2.1-STABLE again. IMHo, wouldn't 2.1.5-STABLE be more appropriate? I'd have thought that it'd be nice to indicate a post-2.1.5-R state. Gary -- Gary Palmer FreeBSD Core Team Member FreeBSD: Turning PC's into workstations. See http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/ for info
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6375.838948846>