Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 03:54:32 +0000 From: Josef Karthauser <joe@tao.org.uk> To: "Andrew R. Reiter" <arr@watson.org> Cc: Josef Karthauser <joe@FreeBSD.ORG>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sbin/ipfw ipfw.c Message-ID: <20011029035432.D881@tao.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1011028225123.31765A-100000@fledge.watson.org>; from arr@watson.org on Sun, Oct 28, 2001 at 10:51:40PM -0500 References: <200110290346.f9T3kSd60147@freefall.freebsd.org> <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1011028225123.31765A-100000@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Sun, Oct 28, 2001 at 10:51:40PM -0500, Andrew R. Reiter wrote: > > Gosh, how many ipfw commits have there been in the past 24hrs? > > :-) Too many! It's almost 4am and it's way past my bed time - I'm a pumpkin! Now ipfw.c in -stable is mostly the same as the one in -current and by diffing the two it's clear what is the differences are. Please ipfw developers, maintain the style across MFC's. I've no idea how it was allowed to get so bad. Joe [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAjvc0vcACgkQXVIcjOaxUBaNiACgy3Gs0mS6vQwaLfLOmab80I8J g34An3iIrtkU5rZiWsJuObIBr01RBOP5 =DbF9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011029035432.D881>