Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 10:01:54 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> To: Riccardo Torrini <riccardo@torrini.org> Cc: Bruce Evans <bde@FreeBSD.org>, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: make includes Message-ID: <20020514070154.GE34081@sunbay.com> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.20020514084559.riccardo@torrini.org> References: <20020514062118.GC34081@sunbay.com> <XFMail.20020514084559.riccardo@torrini.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --]
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 08:45:59AM +0200, Riccardo Torrini wrote:
> On 14-May-2002 (06:21:18/GMT) Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
>
> > I'm still unsure about the name; I'd have liked to rename it to
> > "includesinstall" but that is too long.
>
> Ummmm, buildworld, installworld, buildkernel, installkernel...
> It would be: buildinclude{s}, installinclude{s} just to be simmetric :)
> And is only one (or two) character longer than installkernel...
>
Then "all" should similarly be renamed to "build". I like the idea
of consistent naming. It's a pity we don't have synonyms in make(1).
build: buildprogram buildscripts buildfiles buildmanpages buildincludes
Then s/build/install/g.
"build" should probably be left as "all" for compatibility, I'm not sure.
Then we could say that we reserve target names "all.*" and "install.*",
to avoid possible clashes.
I will see if I can implement something like that in a long term.
Cheers,
--
Ruslan Ermilov Sysadmin and DBA,
ru@sunbay.com Sunbay Software AG,
ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer,
+380.652.512.251 Simferopol, Ukraine
http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve
http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age
[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQE84LZiUkv4P6juNwoRAjQpAJ0ThNuMbZQ2PaeXnyOnwePUqVJJqgCfZ1Rk
nZSZhjzHFl+9eX5f7z9iZzs=
=hV4h
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020514070154.GE34081>