Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 07 May 2007 06:52:21 +0200
From:      Attilio Rao <attilio@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Rui Paulo <rpaulo@fnop.net>
Cc:        Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@FreeBSD.org>, Rui Paulo <rpaulo@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: PERFORCE change 119366 for review
Message-ID:  <463EB085.7080109@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <86irb51xxq.wl%rpaulo@fnop.net>
References:  <200705062022.l46KMIud093057@repoman.freebsd.org>	<463EACD7.8000905@FreeBSD.org> <86irb51xxq.wl%rpaulo@fnop.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Rui Paulo wrote:
> At Mon, 07 May 2007 06:36:39 +0200,
> Attilio Rao wrote:
>> Being more specific, you don't need lock at all there.
>> wrmsr/cpuid are atomic. So you don't need to hang at all there.
> 
> What about rdmsr ?

The same.

Attilio




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?463EB085.7080109>