Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 19:24:13 +0200 From: "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.com> To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Cc: Kurt Buff <kurt.buff@gmail.com> Subject: UEFI & Microsoft thread on questions@ Message-ID: <201206151724.q5FHODOB047794@fire.js.berklix.net>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi freebsd-security@freebsd.org, cc Kurt Buff A thread some of you may like to read: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2012-June/241732.html ] To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org ] Date: Tue Jun 5 18:19:28 UTC 2012 ] From: Kurt Buff kurt.buff at gmail.com ] ] Subject: Is this something we (as consumers of FreeBSD) need to be aware of? ] ] UEFI considerations drive Fedora to pay MSFT to sign their kernel binaries ] http://cwonline.computerworld.com/t/8035515/1292406/565573/0/ ] This would seem to make compiling from source difficult. ] Kurt Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com Reply below not above, cumulative like a play script, & indent with "> ". Format: Plain text. Not HTML, multipart/alternative, base64, quoted-printable. Mail from @yahoo dumped @berklix. http://berklix.org/yahoo/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201206151724.q5FHODOB047794>