Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 1 Nov 2025 02:10:18 +0000
From:      void <void@f-m.fm>
To:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: consequences of __FreeBSD_version changes
Message-ID:  <aQVsCm3G7hkG3PBI@int21h>
In-Reply-To: <52b1737d-f05d-4c38-aca8-913a581b3e2c@plan-b.pwste.edu.pl>
References:  <aQTBM-wOwTbH0DeO@int21h> <7fde9cf8-249a-4eb8-ba75-85472ae4f9fb@plan-b.pwste.edu.pl> <aQTIXYDBrAfFCc4C@int21h> <52b1737d-f05d-4c38-aca8-913a581b3e2c@plan-b.pwste.edu.pl>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

On Fri, Oct 31, 2025 at 04:24:29PM +0100, Marek Zarychta wrote:
>Perhaps I wasn’t clear - I meant that only the build machine (the 
>builder employing WITH_META_MODE) should be upgraded infrequently. The 
>operating systems on consumer machines can and should be reinstalled 
>or upgraded as often as needed, without any restrictions. To fully 
>utilize META_MODE, you should avoid frequent reinstalls or reissues of 
>make install on the build machine.

In this instance, the build machine and the consumer machine are the same,
as it's an in-place upgrade.
-- 


home | help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?aQVsCm3G7hkG3PBI>