Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 13:16:34 +1100 From: Andrew Reilly <areilly@bigpond.net.au> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Samba version in ports Message-ID: <5C30A2D6-4F33-4CCA-AA43-D37E6D79778A@bigpond.net.au> In-Reply-To: <FFB209C5-36CE-4C2B-985F-6807F9910B8B@bigpond.net.au> References: <28504691-D08B-483B-B4C5-CA47F2C523ED@bigpond.net.au> <CANwXMPN7aN1um2GKsccEU_PQ%2BK92fD=CFSJ%2BU7%2BTpKx5FdO74Q@mail.gmail.com> <FFB209C5-36CE-4C2B-985F-6807F9910B8B@bigpond.net.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On 14 Mar 2020, at 12:56 , Andrew Reilly <areilly@bigpond.net.au> = wrote: >=20 > By the way, the current Samba stable release is 4.12.0 (one week old) = and 4.11.0 was released last September. Is there some particular = incompatibility with FreeBSD that is keeping these out of Ports? I got = quite close to trying to build the newer version myself, but then the = problem went away... OK, I've just had a closer look at the several-dozen patch files, and = tried a couple of compilation attempts at 4.11.7, and concede that = getting this into shape is more work than I have time for today. Sigh. = Best of luck to the maintainer. Cheers, Andrew Reilly M: 0409-824-272 areilly@bigpond.net.au
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5C30A2D6-4F33-4CCA-AA43-D37E6D79778A>