Date: 09 May 2003 18:02:35 +0100 From: Paul Richards <paul@freebsd-services.com> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/boot/i386/libi386 i386_module.c Message-ID: <1052499754.619.61.camel@cf.freebsd-services.com> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.20030509130459.jhb@FreeBSD.org> References: <XFMail.20030509130459.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 2003-05-09 at 18:04, John Baldwin wrote: > On 09-May-2003 Paul Richards wrote: > > On Thu, May 01, 2003 at 10:25:37AM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote: > >> John Baldwin wrote: > >> > > >> > On 30-Apr-2003 Peter Wemm wrote: > >> > > peter 2003/04/30 15:02:39 PDT > >> > > > >> > > FreeBSD src repository > >> > > > >> > > Modified files: > >> > > sys/boot/i386/libi386 i386_module.c > >> > > Log: > >> > > ACPI will always be present on AMD64 - it will never be an autodetect > >> > > module. > >> > > >> > I would require it in the kernel rather than load it as a module then. > >> > >> Exactly. But I was just getting annoyed with this warning during > >> development while I had it stubbed out. > > > > You might still want it as a module even if it's mandatory so that > > you can choose which version to load from the bootloader when your > > testing new versions. > > That would only work if the kernel linker supported that. At > the moment it doesn't. :) I don't follow, I do this all the time? or do you mean that having it mandatory would not work if it's also a module? -- Paul Richards <paul@freebsd-services.com> FreeBSD Services Ltd
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1052499754.619.61.camel>