Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 09:19:16 -1000 From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: background_fsck=no does not work? Message-ID: <17005.17076.978073.249234@roam.psg.com> References: <DD8197BD35BCC63A18AF62CB@palle.girgensohn.se> <426BA8FA.3080602@samsco.org> <426BAAE4.1040606@incubus.de> <17005.12955.757773.350868@roam.psg.com> <20050425181329.GA41455@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>>> not always be clean. Softupdates (hopefully) means that it will be >>>> consistent and recoverable, but what you're seeing here is normal and >>> Why "hopefully"? Aren't people convinced that it works correctly? >> i am convinced, but some of the hosts seem not to be :-) >> i see shutdowns which 0 0 0 0 and then shut, and when restarted >> single user and fscked manually show errors. though i think this >> may be in current, which is on most of my hosts. > Yeah, others have reported this problem on -current, but 5.x does not > have it. when will it be mfced to 5.x? :-) randy
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?17005.17076.978073.249234>