Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 23:32:55 +0400 From: "Andrew Pantyukhin" <infofarmer@gmail.com> To: "FreeBSD Ports" <ports@freebsd.org> Subject: portversion and distversion - why not? Message-ID: <cb5206420605011232j5cff24c4hea0e41e3a7493bef@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Portlint says: FATAL: Makefile: either PORTVERSION or DISTVERSION must be specified, not b= oth. Can somebody please explain why? It comes in handy to be able to define illegal distversion instead of redefining the whole distname. B.p.m was designed to handle two different variables in the first place. Should we really abstain from using this functionality?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?cb5206420605011232j5cff24c4hea0e41e3a7493bef>