Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 10:25:24 -0500 From: Kirk Strauser <kirk@strauser.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: postfix or qmail? Message-ID: <200506181025.25239.kirk@strauser.com> In-Reply-To: <200506181124.09562.l0kit0@exactas.org> References: <200506181124.09562.l0kit0@exactas.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart2912223.uk5iz9ftoU Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Saturday 18 June 2005 06:24 am, Luciano Musacchio wrote: > I've a simple question, postfix or qmail? :) My choice is Postfix. It's still under active development and isn't hamper= ed=20 by bizarre licensing and enormous egos. =46urthermore, Qmail seems to have earned its reputation for security the=20 standard DJB way: by implementing only the easy parts of the standard and=20 complaining loudly about the hard parts ("those are insecure!") until=20 everyone quits asking for them. > Other thing (perhaps, the one that I interest more your opinion), do anyo= ne > know why MacOS X Server is using postfix instead of qmail? All technical debates aside, Qmail isn't F/OSS software. They couldn't shi= p=20 it without getting a custom license. =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser --nextPart2912223.uk5iz9ftoU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCtDzl5sRg+Y0CpvERAryCAKCTEZf4ZbuR3CPHPaaeqDS6TNfL5ACdG7Ry LjreLJIkko5QwPh4txS7rWU= =Ht9i -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2912223.uk5iz9ftoU--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200506181025.25239.kirk>