Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 18 Jun 2005 10:25:24 -0500
From:      Kirk Strauser <kirk@strauser.com>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: postfix or qmail?
Message-ID:  <200506181025.25239.kirk@strauser.com>
In-Reply-To: <200506181124.09562.l0kit0@exactas.org>
References:  <200506181124.09562.l0kit0@exactas.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart2912223.uk5iz9ftoU
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Saturday 18 June 2005 06:24 am, Luciano Musacchio wrote:

> I've a simple question, postfix or qmail? :)

My choice is Postfix.  It's still under active development and isn't hamper=
ed=20
by bizarre licensing and enormous egos.

=46urthermore, Qmail seems to have earned its reputation for security the=20
standard DJB way: by implementing only the easy parts of the standard and=20
complaining loudly about the hard parts ("those are insecure!") until=20
everyone quits asking for them.

> Other thing (perhaps, the one that I interest more your opinion), do anyo=
ne
> know why MacOS X Server is using postfix instead of qmail?

All technical debates aside, Qmail isn't F/OSS software.  They couldn't shi=
p=20
it without getting a custom license.
=2D-=20
Kirk Strauser

--nextPart2912223.uk5iz9ftoU
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBCtDzl5sRg+Y0CpvERAryCAKCTEZf4ZbuR3CPHPaaeqDS6TNfL5ACdG7Ry
LjreLJIkko5QwPh4txS7rWU=
=Ht9i
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart2912223.uk5iz9ftoU--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200506181025.25239.kirk>