Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 18:24:57 +0900 From: Shunsuke SHINOMIYA <shino@fornext.org> To: Max Laier <max@love2party.net> Cc: Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org> Subject: Re[2]: High rate traffic silence an em interface. Message-ID: <20040930175812.F7FE.SHINO@fornext.org> In-Reply-To: <200409292038.23349.max@love2party.net> References: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1040924135726.82478I-100000@fledge.watson.org> <200409292038.23349.max@love2party.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> This might be my fault! Just committed a fix from Mike Makonnen, that might > solve the problem you are seeing. Yes, the problem is solved. Thank you!!! BTW, I noticed that netstat -m shows odd informations after that netrate test at BETA5. It seems that memory leak or unnecessary freeing occur. > # netstat -m > 4294950224 mbufs in use > 10436/25600 mbuf clusters in use (current/max) > 0/3/6656 sfbufs in use (current/peak/max) > 16604 KBytes allocated to network > 0 requests for sfbufs denied > 0 requests for sfbufs delayed > 0 requests for I/O initiated by sendfile > 0 calls to protocol drain routines But, a combination of BETA5 kernel and sys/dev/em/* of -current does not have this problem. -- Shunsuke SHINOMIYA <shino@fornext.org>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040930175812.F7FE.SHINO>