Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:27:31 -0600 (CST)
From:      Philip Hallstrom <freebsd@philip.pjkh.com>
To:        Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Peter aka SweetPete <swtpete@gmail.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: binary called "top" not have realtime filter/search? [#SHAZBOTAA7235423352662A]
Message-ID:  <20070112192639.Q67707@bravo.pjkh.com>
In-Reply-To: <20070113010737.GC1715@kobe.laptop>
References:  <ad32ec270701121402x78ba753ib5726a117c38f435@mail.gmail.com> <20070113010737.GC1715@kobe.laptop>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On 2007-01-12 14:02, Peter aka SweetPete <swtpete@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I've red the manpage for "top" (from heh heh "top" to bottom...),
>> and I am amazed that there is not a feature to hit '/' or '?' in
>> order to search and display only processes which match a certain
>> keyword/search term.  For example, a user running top could hit '/'
>> and enter "fire", which would display processes related to
>> "firefox."
>
> That's an excellent idea :)
>
> Should we also allow for limiting by other stuff too, i.e. like the
> 'l' command in the mail/mutt mailer accepts a 'limit pattern' with a
> syntax like:
...
>
> Limiting by username or user ID
>
>    ~u username		only show processes of user `username'
>    ~U uid		only show processes of user uid
>    ~U uidmin-uidmax	only show processes of users minuid-maxuid


username is already there...

u      Display only processes owned by a specific username (prompt  for
username).   If  the username specified is simply "+", then processes
belonging to all users will be displayed.


-philip



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070112192639.Q67707>