Date: Sun, 09 May 1999 18:19:04 +1000 From: Gavan McCormack <tetragon@bitey.cyber.com.au> To: Tom <tom@uniserve.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NFS question.. Message-ID: <373544F8.2CA1CFBD@bitey.cyber.com.au> References: <Pine.BSF.4.02A.9905082352270.11097-100000@shell.uniserve.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Tom wrote: > On Sun, 9 May 1999, Gavan McCormack wrote: > > I have been hearing around that NFSv3 is the only 'good' NFS, and so far no > > free Unixen have v3 implemented yet. I guess we will just have to wait.. :/ > This isn't right either. FreeBSD has had NFSv3 for quite some time. It > just needs more testing. I assume you mean in -CURRENT? This is the -STABLE list remember. :) Still, good to know that v3 is being worked on and will be in there once all the issues are worked out. (Almost tempted to switch to -CURRENT, but I think I will resist that temptation.) On a side note, I have to say that the SYSV-ish NFS under Linux, though it can export on a per-directory basis, seemed to have its own quirks and problems when I used it. Its been a little while now, but I think I would prefer to live with the tested NFS under FreeBSD than try to hack in the Linux NFS. After all, thats why I run -STABLE.. > Tom -- ________________________________________________________________________ Gavan A. McCormack - tetragon@cyber.com.au - tetragon@bitey.net Cybersource P/L. TCPIP network management & Unix system administration. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?373544F8.2CA1CFBD>