Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 10:22:31 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 194985] getdtablecount new syscall from openbsd Message-ID: <bug-194985-8-CxzQmeokpI@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-194985-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-194985-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194985 --- Comment #2 from David CARLIER <david.carlier@hardenedbsd.org> --- https://github.com/HardenedBSD/hardenedBSD/issues/63 So mm@ would not need to silent getdtablecount calls anymore. So right, FILEDESC_SLOCK should protect f_dp field enough I think ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-194985-8-CxzQmeokpI>