Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 13:57:32 +0900 From: Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@FreeBSD.org> To: Max Laier <mlaier@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet ip_fw.h ip_fw2.c ip_fw_pfil.c ip_input.c Message-ID: <yge8xp7hmbn.wl%ume@mahoroba.org> In-Reply-To: <200605120441.k4C4fSl7018302@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200605120441.k4C4fSl7018302@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi,
>>>>> On Fri, 12 May 2006 04:41:28 +0000 (UTC)
>>>>> Max Laier <mlaier@FreeBSD.org> said:
mlaier> mlaier 2006-05-12 04:41:28 UTC
mlaier> Modified files:
mlaier> sys/netinet ip_fw.h ip_fw2.c ip_fw_pfil.c ip_input.c
mlaier> Log:
mlaier> Reintroduce net.inet6.ip6.fw.enable sysctl to dis/enable the ipv6 processing
mlaier> seperately. Also use pfil hook/unhook instead of keeping the check
It seems net.inet6.ip6.fw.enable is conflict between ipfw and ip6fw,
now. I think that it prevent users from using ipfw for IPv4 and ip6fw
for IPv6.
Sincerely,
--
Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan
ume@mahoroba.org ume@{,jp.}FreeBSD.org
http://www.imasy.org/~ume/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?yge8xp7hmbn.wl%ume>