Date: Sun, 15 Feb 1998 19:34:07 +0100 From: Eivind Eklund <eivind@yes.no> To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Suggested change to bsd.prog.mk Message-ID: <19980215193407.36627@follo.net>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Index: bsd.prog.mk
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/share/mk/bsd.prog.mk,v
retrieving revision 1.59
diff -u -r1.59 bsd.prog.mk
--- bsd.prog.mk 1997/12/18 12:56:52 1.59
+++ bsd.prog.mk 1998/02/15 18:13:45
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
.endif
.if defined(PROG)
+.if !target(${PROG})
.if defined(SRCS)
DPSRCS+= ${SRCS:M*.h}
@@ -47,6 +48,7 @@
${CC} ${CFLAGS} ${LDFLAGS} -o ${.TARGET} ${OBJS} ${LDDESTDIR} ${LDADD}
.endif
+.endif
.if !defined(MAN1) && !defined(MAN2) && !defined(MAN3) && \
!defined(MAN4) && !defined(MAN5) && !defined(MAN6) && \
Do anybody see any negative effects of not trying to transform PROG
from C source if the target is already defined?
It fixes some of my problems; specifically, it allows a Makefile like
the below to work:
PROG=testprog
NOMAN=yes
STRIP=
${PROG}: ${PROG}.pl
install -c -m 555 ${.CURDIR}/${PROG}.pl ${.OBJDIR}/${PROG}
.include <bsd.prog.mk>
This is IMHO much better than the beforeinstall: hacks that are spread
around the FreeBSD source tree. It seems less like a hack, and allow
one to use ${.OBJDIR}/${PROG} for direct execution. The above is
actually a slightly edited Makefile from my build-cycle, and
'testprog' is never installed anywhere, but just used in place.
Eivind.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980215193407.36627>