Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 08 Aug 2004 16:10:58 +0200
From:      Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Yen-Ming Lee <leeym@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: ports/textproc/p5-Pod-Stripper Makefile ports/textproc/p5-PodParser         Makefile ports/textproc/p5-podlators Makefile         ports/textproc/p5-Pod-Constants Makefile
Message-ID:  <12F0216CE48BCF997F253627@nescarba.in.t-online.fr>
In-Reply-To: <20040808140705.GA60628@utopia.leeym.com>
References:  <20040805011031.54E8C16A4EC@hub.freebsd.org> <A8C9A736488D04551C27E44C@nescarba.in.t-online.fr> <20040808140705.GA60628@utopia.leeym.com>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

[-- Attachment #1 --]
+-le 08/08/2004 22:07 +0800, Yen-Ming Lee écrivait :
| On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 10:57:42AM +0200, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
|> +-le 05/08/2004 01:10 +0000, Yen-Ming Lee écrivait :
|> | leeym       2004-08-05 01:10:27 UTC
|> | 
|> |   - p5-podlators and p5-PodParser conflict with perl 5.6 or above.
|> |     They should be conditional dependency when PERL_LEVEL < 500601.
|> |   
|> |   - add "CONFLICTS= perl-5.6.* perl-5.8.*" in p5-podlators and
|> |   p5-PodParser
|> This is a very bad idea, because all ports depending on them are now broken
|> too. Moreover, these add more up-to-date versions of the modules and
|> scripts, which are needed by some ports that depend on them. And to
|> finish, these ports do not really CONFLICT, well the do but, because they
|> install newer versions of these scripts.
|> If you want to maintain these CONFLICT lines, at least, update the ports
|> depending on them so that they build now (and check that they build with
|> the stock versions of these modules).
| 
| One way is what I mentioned that to make p5-podlators and p5-PodParser as
| optional dependency, and keep that CONFLICT to perl 5.6 or above.
| 
| The alternative is that not to install scripts in PREFIX/bin when installing
| p5-podlators and p5-PodParser under perl 5.6 or above.
| 
| Which way do you prefer? the second one?

I think I'd rather take the second one, yes.

-- 
Mathieu Arnold
[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32)

iQEVAwUBQRY0dlvROjYJ63c1AQL/Agf/dvWjNRpUFyQN4WL7Cvla6W2I3zETKvk6
X84hGD0lOlVAtnA87+CHUK6KeaPrQ3zOiooEqOpQMkC/+mmmsWIgxeavEGPO+2Pe
CKDigX/S5qCTTYZuAgJOJl4Op71PiHDyf739Dv49s3+pazBgpyKTeP5ix8A4iBFI
oChH02l9ebNC7sI6cPaV6x55UajpSz18f4rO1SO4A0sq/z2BHKUXDoqUTg3ZwwRf
CagJJw3nMOsLNGXZc6th5bXZccpy8GpJfZvh1I+rqxNjxH89HdghdtKH9cdSGyac
UvhzmBJQ58YimJo+8iH/95ATDIDgf9K+xJj8PyiXXQ5n8At9nGBSMw==
=ry4A
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
help

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?12F0216CE48BCF997F253627>