Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2010 16:41:54 -0700 From: Rob Farmer <rfarmer@predatorlabs.net> To: Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net>, Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: No-op port updates Message-ID: <AANLkTiniHaQGXUcMCpX1y=Sfh35xS-sMk5kzD0F%2BCSmg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20101016212441.GA3815@straylight.ringlet.net> References: <AANLkTi=sPgM4o0TPTpEJmp5KmrKFHtPbKYTdZAXE%2B4tW@mail.gmail.com> <4CB9D73B.1080800@FreeBSD.org> <20101016212441.GA3815@straylight.ringlet.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 14:24, Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> wrote: > I've sometimes added a comment to the port's Makefile explaining > the needlessness of an update. Ok - I'm not sure if this is worthy of adding to the PR load so I'll just post it to the list and if someone has time, great, if not, that's fine too. The port is security/wipe and the only difference between 2.3.0 and 2.3.1 is a Makefile tweak regarding uninstallation (since we use pkg-plist, not the supplied target, it doesn't matter). -- Rob Farmer
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTiniHaQGXUcMCpX1y=Sfh35xS-sMk5kzD0F%2BCSmg>