Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 19:39:13 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua> To: pluknet <pluknet@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Jung-uk Kim <jkim@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: 8.1-PRERELEASE: CPU packages not detected correctly Message-ID: <4C6D5E31.9000701@icyb.net.ua> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikFdbVhMYd1tktfYehuAdqEVCDWaN=YbOG=c6xB@mail.gmail.com> References: <201007141414.o6EEEUx9014690@lurza.secnetix.de> <201007141755.04690.jkim@FreeBSD.org> <4C3FB73F.7070502@freebsd.org> <201007161147.56242.jkim@FreeBSD.org> <AANLkTikFdbVhMYd1tktfYehuAdqEVCDWaN=YbOG=c6xB@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 10/08/2010 19:55 pluknet said the following: > On 16 July 2010 19:47, Jung-uk Kim <jkim@freebsd.org> wrote: >> The patch should apply fine on both sys/amd64/amd64/mp_machdep.c and >> sys/i386/i386/mp_machdep.c. >> >> http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/mp_machdep2.diff >> > > > Hi. > > Just checked on Xen HVM with 3 cores. > 1) 8.1 unmodified: > FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 3 CPUs > FreeBSD/SMP: 1 package(s) x 3 core(s) > > 2) 8.1 + patch > FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 3 CPUs > FreeBSD/SMP: 0 package(s) x 1 core(s) x 32 HTT threads > WARNING: Non-uniform processors. > WARNING: Using suboptimal topology. Can you debug, e.g. with printfs, what exactly goes wrong? I wonder if in this case code follows some unusual/unexpected path. BTW, could you please also provide CPU name/model/features as detected by the kernel? Thanks! -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C6D5E31.9000701>