Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2024 13:24:29 +0100 From: Julien Cigar <julien@perdition.city> To: Andrea Brancatelli <andrea@brancatelli.it> Cc: fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS on a shared iSCSI Message-ID: <nloyl5bv5xlh4x5sygl3ekibe7piy4tggidl4vzxczvypuayis@ea2qj3ylvb2s> In-Reply-To: <CAGqQmRPssfrb9S6r0H4SaQLEfOTp5Qx7-HSvHtYkxMnpeqKWjQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAGqQmRPssfrb9S6r0H4SaQLEfOTp5Qx7-HSvHtYkxMnpeqKWjQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--ppdebwkw7x3q32sg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Feb 07, 2024 at 11:55:54AM +0100, Andrea Brancatelli wrote: > Hello guys, I'm not 100% this is the correct list to ask this question, if > not please feel free to point me in the right direction. >=20 > I was wondering what could be the best recipe to have an HA cluster shari= ng > an external ZFS storage. >=20 > Let's say I have two servers running a bunch of Jails and, thus, I'd like > to use ZFS as the underlying storage layer and I have an external (iSCSI) > storage connected. >=20 > Would it be "easily possible" to have some (2?) iSCSI LUN exposed to both > servers and then activate the pool on one or the other server? >=20 > The idea would be to reactivate the filesystem from server A on server B = if > the server A fails. >=20 > Would it be "easier" to replicate everything and zfs send datas back and > forth? Clearly that would mean doubling datas and havin a scheduled repli= ca > with a possible delay in data replication, so I'd like to avoid this. >=20 > Any thoughts? I asked something similar a few years ago, the whole thread may be an inter= esting read: https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs/2016-June/023456.html Just to say that I tried a lot of different things, and came up to the conclusion that for critical production usage all those things are fragile and with hidden dragons everywhere. I love FreeBSD (I use it exclusively everywhere, also at work), but there aren't any supported open-source solution for something like an "highly available ZFS cluster". On the commercial side there is RSF-1 and beasts like Pure storage ($$$) but ... I would really like to see CEPH ported to FreeBSD, that would be extremely useful Julien >=20 > Thanks a lot. >=20 > --=20 > *Andrea Brancatelli* --=20 Julien Cigar Belgian Biodiversity Platform (http://www.biodiversity.be) PGP fingerprint: EEF9 F697 4B68 D275 7B11 6A25 B2BB 3710 A204 23C0 No trees were killed in the creation of this message. However, many electrons were terribly inconvenienced. --ppdebwkw7x3q32sg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEnF27CBNtOraRNmgqCLYqJMpBHmkFAmXDdnoACgkQCLYqJMpB HmkWCRAAxpLKKakPNDKjgqsrCUtD7T3wN5dxzzQrL/2ipRiG1Azt7Q179aFYqf5L H4n57+CZ8vfdE9xO7qV3v8HRN3M3JhtfF53JdzRh+s4VsIqLr1mLwvtiP9hsG3aL 3vfl50VDJamvR2qIdrdnwqNrSl9BrCK7ea6qGzRiyUB2yiLxXiOteOp7CT6GyDlV 9qFI2HGNXYNAytm3fBkmR71xsi2UcFYXtkSjkrFhD9k47SAu3VdK5APqGX1oj7QE a0v2rburG4BvbqyNuiy3U7LKFH18xY5l8HAXudiTLVzbNfPMRhgSsGYcqodIgFfH C3uNRG0+u1NDlt6Vh2MY+xvWC7CzAhZX8PkMBhPrq2PJo9keisd4qjhLXq1vBFaV MUFLZAnKz/H2WAh0bQ9PQsHMZhHWizvVdRXSy3hdIGj6A6B/xedR9j+ISzPcsthU s+6iA3rqIR4vbHDUTkbv85H7/yzmY9l6u9czYeVZX/ve1VwkYAh/XYKhZNsSgJjr BBG6eTX7QoONgnLYQSHzWneu3ainihxMk4c7PrQLUUD9oGMwsd1oR/APec5fEKtK vcpLeipmN45Rhy8nj4EHnuzy6/lQPfEs1MenbGMYBU5zNfPRqUR6ULbiMEksYWyV r8hJADa16cV5De4WRpg8Emo5zNWp5tdDBliKhwqHhyGdxpKsC2w= =dOEi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ppdebwkw7x3q32sg--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?nloyl5bv5xlh4x5sygl3ekibe7piy4tggidl4vzxczvypuayis>