Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 03:39:19 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.org> To: =?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: named now runs chroot'ed by default Message-ID: <20040930033816.H57326@ync.qbhto.arg> In-Reply-To: <xzpzn38izrd.fsf@dwp.des.no> References: <20040928025635.Q5094@ync.qbhto.arg> <727FCC18-1156-11D9-BBA6-000D936BE398@beforever.com> <xzpbrfp1j0k.fsf@dwp.des.no><20040929110207.S90578@qbhto.arg> <xzpzn38izrd.fsf@dwp.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.org> writes:
>> Dmitry beat me to it, but yes, I'm 99% sure that'll do it for you. Can
>> you please test it and confirm that Dmitry is correct, and if so I can
>> add a commented out entry to the named.conf file.
>
> yep, works fine.
>
> you should test it with -4 or on a non-IPv6 kernel, with a little luck
> you won't need to have it commented out.
If enabled by default on a non-IPv6 system it prints a warning, which
was part of the reason to add the option in the first place. :)
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040930033816.H57326>