Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 12:11:58 -0700 From: Jeffrey Bouquet <jeffreybouquet@yahoo.com> To: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org Subject: pkg problem again (pkg upgrade, specifically) Message-ID: <5568B9FE.6000106@yahoo.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I can install packages but not use package upgrade, it piecemeal wants to remove AFAIK practically all of the ports, which I can then reinstall with portupgrade: portupgrade -PP -i -f zinf ........................................................ Script started on Fri May 29 12:00:41 2015 command: /usr/local/sbin/pkg-static upgrade Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. All repositories are up-to-date. Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 0% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 0% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 1% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 2% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 3% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 4% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 5% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 6% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 7% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 8% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 9% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 10% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 11% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 12% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 13% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 14% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 15% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 16% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 17% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 18% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 19% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 20% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 21% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 22% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 23% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 24% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 25% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 26% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 27% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 28% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 29% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 30% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 31% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 32% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 33% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 34% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 35% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 36% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 37% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 38% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 39% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 40% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 41% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 42% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 43% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 44% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 45% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 46% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 47% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 48% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 49% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 50% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 51% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 52% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 53% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 54% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 55% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 56% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 57% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 58% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 59% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 60% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 61% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 62% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 63% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 64% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 65% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 66% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 67% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 68% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 69% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 70% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 71% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 72% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 73% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 74% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 75% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 76% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 77% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 78% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 79% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 80% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 81% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 82% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 83% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 84% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 85% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 86% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 87% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 88% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 89% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 90% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 91% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 92% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 93% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 94% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 95% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 96% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 97% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 98% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 99% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 100% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 0% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 0% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 1% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 2% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 3% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 4% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 5% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 6% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 7% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 8% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 9% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 10% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 11% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 12% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 13% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 14% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 15% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 16% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 17% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 18% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 19% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 20% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 21% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 22% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 23% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 24% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 25% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 26% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 27% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 28% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 29% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 30% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 31% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 32% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 33% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 34% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 35% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 36% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 37% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 38% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 39% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 40% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 41% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 42% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 43% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 44% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 45% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 46% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 47% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 48% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 49% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 50% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 51% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 52% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 53% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 54% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 55% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 56% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 57% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 58% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 59% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 60% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 61% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 62% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 63% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 64% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 65% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 66% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 67% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 68% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 69% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 70% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 71% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 72% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 73% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 74% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 75% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 76% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 77% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 78% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 79% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 80% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 81% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 82% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 83% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 84% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 85% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 86% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 87% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 88% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 89% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 90% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 91% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 92% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 93% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 94% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 95% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 96% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 97% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 100% pkg-static: Cannot solve problem using SAT solver: upgrade rule: upgrade local xpn-1.2.6_5 to remote xpn-1.2.6_5 cannot install package xpn, remove it from request? [Y/n]: n pkg-static: cannot solve job using SAT solver Script done on Fri May 29 12:01:04 2015 ....................................................................................... So xpn, pkg cannot , delete xpn then AFAIK twenty x.... ports need removal then twenty w.... then twenty v... approximate of course, but since I already "pkg check -Ba " and "pkg update -f " etc... This was working in the v10 before the upgrade to v11, AND was working on the v11 system the upgrade (/usr/src and /usr/obj) were used for. So why when all was in place for an upgrade, would "pkg upgrade" be unworkable again? To complicate matters, the database file is (3xxx ports) too large to send for debugging AFAIK. I suppose "pkg upgrade" could be enhanced to due more before halting, or print a more precise error. Even twenty lines of debugging to be posted somewhere... .............................................................. Also I thought, pkg should itself have an UPDATING file, since the rewrite of configuration files, possible bootstrap, commands which work better and which work worse across major updates, etc etc. It appears even maybe pkg "forgot" about installed ports upon a simple v10 > v11 upgrade, luckily I had the previous backup to list the ports from and do some shell pipes so most (not all) are reinstalled as I write this. Although I have not double checked. .....................................................................
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5568B9FE.6000106>