Date: Wed, 23 May 2018 11:29:31 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 205930] clang(1) doesn't document all flags and options Message-ID: <bug-205930-227-RUu1Ten4D9@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-205930-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-205930-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205930 Eitan Adler <eadler@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |Works As Intended Status|New |Closed --- Comment #3 from Eitan Adler <eadler@FreeBSD.org> --- You're absolutely correct that clang can do a much better job of documentation its options. That said, since the FreeBSD project uses clang as a pure third party compiler, and isn't in the business of writing a compiler, I am closing this bug without action. It isn't exactly "work's as intended" so much as "we're the wrong people to fix this issue". It can be argued if we should have taken this into account when we made the switch etc. but this bug is the wrong place for that argument. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-205930-227-RUu1Ten4D9>