Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 5 Jul 2014 10:43:16 +0200
From:      Axel Rau <Axel.Rau@Chaos1.DE>
To:        FreeBSD-security@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: RFC: Proposal: Install a /etc/ssl/cert.pem by default?
Message-ID:  <A640A06B-4A40-4086-A5C0-3F32FF62BFD0@Chaos1.DE>
In-Reply-To: <21429.55379.293697.133423@hergotha.csail.mit.edu>
References:  <53B499B1.4090003@delphij.net> <53B4B7FB.6070407@FreeBSD.org> <53B56F49.7030109@FreeBSD.org> <CAF6rxgmsoJCnCpnGKUXe0jnPEgGNm3BB_SF73vLOkK5X9pOoPw@mail.gmail.com> <20140703221448.GA99094@calvin.ustdmz.roe.ch> <21429.55379.293697.133423@hergotha.csail.mit.edu>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail


Am 04.07.2014 um 00:25 schrieb Garrett Wollman <wollman@bimajority.org>:

> <<On Fri, 4 Jul 2014 00:14:48 +0200, Daniel Roethlisberger <daniel@roe.ch> said:
> 
>> [1] There is no such thing as a perfect CA bundle (i.e. both
>>    secure *and* usable) given how broken the whole CA system is
>>    these days.
> 
> So is anyone working on DANE support in libfetch and other base-system
> utilities?  Let's lead on this rather than just flaming about how CAs
> suck….
+1 DANE is the route to go in the future.
It perfectly matches the use case discussed here.

Axel
---
PGP-Key:29E99DD6  ☀ +49 151 2300 9283  ☀ computing @ chaos claudius



home | help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?A640A06B-4A40-4086-A5C0-3F32FF62BFD0>