Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 14:47:08 -0500 From: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> To: Pascal Hofstee <caelian@gmail.com> Cc: gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ltverhack problem Message-ID: <1140810428.24112.43.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> In-Reply-To: <1140809962.825.22.camel@synergy.odyssey.homeunix.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Fri, 2006-02-24 at 11:39 -0800, Pascal Hofstee wrote: > Hi, > > Ade just pointed out (and i observed it myself as well) that a lot of > MC-gnome ports currently get marked BROKEN because the change from > USE_AUTOOLS=libtool:15 to GNU_AUTOCONF=yes breaks the "ltverhack without > libtool" integrity check, since libtool is apparently now no longer > explicitely marked as a dependency. > > Would there be a way to make ltverhack smarter to handle this changem, > do we need to explicitely put USE_AUTOTOOLS=libtool:15 back in, or > should we remove the "ltverhack without libtool" check entirely ? How is this working in the FreeBSD ports tree? The same check exists there, and there are ports using ltverhack in the tree. Joe > -- PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBD/2K8b2iPiv4Uz4cRAusBAJ9anAkMdDz5yoBE5psug15D3Fe9ngCeLNMM bmBT9Hi0PSiHM5sVREWka6Y= =bWxL -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1140810428.24112.43.camel>