Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2000 10:15:20 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 2nd call for reviews and tests: buf->bio patch Message-ID: <200004031715.KAA59798@apollo.backplane.com> References: <20937.954764918@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
: http://phk.freebsd.dk/misc : :I belive the patch is now fundamentally ready for commit, I'm running :it here myself, and the delta in kernel warnings have been analyzed :and deemed mostly harmless. : :Some componenents are still not converted and use a cast from bio to :buf, prominently vinum and ccd, but they should work all the same :anyway. : :Poul-Henning Ripping up the buffer cache right smack in the middle of Greg trying to debug a serious vinum/bio problem is atrocious timing. I have no words to describe how following that up with even more commits, despite the complaints, should be categorized. I don't understand while you haven't backed these commits out and I doubly do not understand why you continue to make further commits. And this isn't even counting the fact that you've done all of this without word-1 to group discussion-wise. I'm all for separating the I/O from the buffer cache, but forcing it into the tree as a done-deal when two other people are also actively working in the VFS/BIO subsystem is unjustifiable (in the extreme). -Matt Matthew Dillon <dillon@backplane.com> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200004031715.KAA59798>