Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 01:54:13 +0800 From: Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org> To: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it> Cc: "freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org" <Freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org>, Luigi Rizzo <luigi@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: dummynet loses ports mask bits Message-ID: <87c6774f-1a6a-c547-a027-17baa6d3d9f9@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <CA%2BhQ2%2BjQGyYUXKVTRf8Hfnc-_1F0pVnO=xTaCwEsra6anJn9Ng@mail.gmail.com> References: <e3fb1af2-18b1-acb3-91de-ce302486b8d4@freebsd.org> <CA%2BhQ2%2BjQGyYUXKVTRf8Hfnc-_1F0pVnO=xTaCwEsra6anJn9Ng@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 1/3/17 1:46 am, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 9:27 AM, Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org> wrote: >> In the following example it appears that the mask bits for the port number >> are lost. >> before I raise a bug.. is there anyone who can see that I am doing anything >> wrong? >> >> I'm not sure what the q131053 stuff is about either, but.. > q131053 is the internal name for the queue associated with the pipe > (pipe# + 0x10000). > I am not sure if the mask supports ip/port notation (dst-ip covers > only the address part). > Of course the real bug is that the parser should be more strict and complain > about extra/ignored fields. But the ipfw parser is full of these things. > > cheers > luigi my error is I should have used dst-port 0x000f not /0x000f seems to be working now > >> ------------------------------------------ >> FreeBSD fb10-cc03.kumo.com 10.3-RELEASE-p16 : Wed Feb 22 14:40:53 UTC 2017 >> amd64 >> >> fb10-cc03# ipfw pipe 11 config mask dst-ip 0x000000ff/0x0fff bw 200Kbit/s >> >> fb10-cc03# ipfw pipe show >> 00011: 200.000 Kbit/s 0 ms burst 0 >> q131083 50 sl. 0 flows (1 buckets) sched 65547 weight 0 lmax 0 pri 0 >> droptail >> sched 65547 type FIFO flags 0x1 64 buckets 0 active >> mask: 0x00 0x00000000/0x0000 -> 0x000000ff/0x0000 >> > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?87c6774f-1a6a-c547-a027-17baa6d3d9f9>