Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2000 12:21:32 -0800 (PST) From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> To: Matt Heckaman <matt@ARPA.MAIL.NET> Cc: FreeBSD-STABLE <FreeBSD-STABLE@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Some observations on 4.0-release and 4.0-stable Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0003201216360.86592-100000@freefall.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0003201159280.17426-100000@epsilon.lucida.qc.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 20 Mar 2000, Matt Heckaman wrote:
> First of all, I'd like to say that I'm finding FreeBSD 4.0 quite nice
> indeed, some very nice advancements over 3.x. Here are some things I've
> noticed so far though;
>
> * make world bombs if MAKE_KERBEROS4=NO, but I suppose I should be making
> that nonetheless, yes? =)
The contents of MAKE_KERBEROS[45] don't matter, it only looks whether or
not the variable is set. Similarly, doing NOCRYPT=NO won't cause the build
to compile with crypto support (two wrongs make a right), it will compile
withOUT crypto. I think sheldonh was looking at documenting this better in
make.conf.
However, world builds with MAKE_KERBEROS4 set _should_ work, if you have
up-to-date sources.
Kris
----
In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate.
-- Charles Forsythe <forsythe@alum.mit.edu>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0003201216360.86592-100000>