Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 10:49:32 +0200 (CEST) From: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at> To: "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" <grog@freebsd.org> Cc: Wilko Bulte <wkb@freebie.xs4all.nl>, Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <asmodai@freebsd.org>, <cvs-committers@freebsd.org>, <cvs-all@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/modules/iir Makefile Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.44.0205061045190.60342-100000@pulcherrima.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> In-Reply-To: <20020506102751.X34811@wantadilla.lemis.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 6 May 2002, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: >> I see lots of MFCs, but no Approved by: re@ in sight. > Well, I've done a couple of commits during code freeze, both Approved > by: murray. I think it's better to put an individual name there in > case of questions. Ideally both, when someone has a specific hat on? "Approved: re (murray)" or "Approved: murray (re)" Similarly, for the ports I noticed that often changes get committed with "Approved: maintainer" where (I think) "Approved: foo@example.com (maintainer)" would be more suitable. Both maintainers and the re team change, so having both the concrete person *and* its hat specified seems preferrable. Gerald -- Gerald "Jerry" pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at http://www.dbai.tuwien.ac.at/~pfeifer/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.44.0205061045190.60342-100000>